You are here

2015 Judge Rana Mitter on what makes a Samuel Johnson Prize-winning book

2015 Judge Rana Mitter on what makes a Samuel Johnson Prize-winning book

There’s no obvious answer to the question of what marks out the non-fiction book of the year.  The past few years have seen the Samuel Johnson Prize go to a biography of an Italian poet and political firebrand; a study of a devastating famine visited on Mao’s China; and a memoir that brings together goshawks and grieving in an utterly innovative take on traditional nature writing.
 

So that makes the task before my fellow judges and me a pretty hard one to define. First of all, the size of the task. There is a lot of very good non-fiction out there and the judging panel has to read a great deal of it to get a sense of what has been published. My own specialism is in modern Chinese history but I’ve quickly developed an instant education in a whole variety of areas from archaeology to astronomy to architecture. All the judges are reading in areas that might not be anywhere near their normal areas of interest – and that’s what makes this such a powerful, though exciting, challenge.

Because the book we want to choose in the end – and we are still a long way from having any idea which book that might be – needs to be something that will speak to a readership beyond its own subject; it will need to be a book with resonance. Of course it will need to be well-researched, if it’s a book of history or science, and certainly well-written. But it also needs to capture some sense of a wider connection to the public conversation. We are certainly not looking for a book that is about the zeitgeist – nor could any of the winners over the years be accused of being only modish successes. In retrospect, the first ever winner, Antony Beevor’s ‘Stalingrad’, heralded a moment when the history of war moved in a new direction, with detailed accounts of soldiers’ experiences every bit as important as top-down military strategy. Last year’s winner, Helen Macdonald’s ‘H is for Hawk’ stood in a much longer tradition of British nature writing, but brought a personal element to it that made it truly a book of the early twenty-first century. A new way of looking at nature was also at the heart of a previous winner, Philip Hoare’s ‘Leviathan’. We are seeking another such book that has the distinctiveness and connection to the wider conversations of today.

LATEST NEWS

The judging panel for the 2017 Baillie Gifford...
Philippe Sands
On 15 November Philippe Sands won the Baillie...
Earlier this week, Philippe Sands won the 2016...
East West Street
Philippe Sands has been named the winner of The...